TL;DR
Geofencing blocks users in restricted countries or states from accessing prediction markets. It is a core compliance tool but is imperfect, as VPNs can mask true locations — a gap platforms are actively closing.
Key Points
✓Polymarket restricts access in 33 or more countries as of early 2026, including OFAC-sanctioned nations, EU gambling-law jurisdictions, and several Asian markets.
✓US residents are blocked from Polymarket unless they use the platform's own US-licensed entity following its late 2025 relaunch, which requires full KYC.
✓Kalshi enforces state-level geofencing in jurisdictions that challenge its CFTC-regulated status, while asserting federal preemption in court.
✓Polymarket began actively blocking VPN IP addresses in early 2026 and requiring identity verification for suspicious accounts, after 30-plus countries banned the platform.
✓Geofencing is a technical implementation of AML sanctions requirements: blocking users from OFAC-sanctioned countries is a legal obligation, not merely a business choice.
How Geofencing Works in Practice
Prediction market platforms implement geofencing primarily through IP-address lookup services that map a connection's origin to a country or region. When a user's IP resolves to a blocked jurisdiction, the platform denies access or prevents trading. KYC identity verification adds a second layer: even if a VPN masks the IP, document checks tied to government-issued ID can confirm residency. Polymarket enforces both checks for high-volume users, requiring traders running seven-figure positions to verify identity regardless of their apparent IP location. Anti-Money Laundering obligations under OFAC rules make blocking sanctioned-country users a legal necessity, not an option. Platforms that fail to implement adequate geofencing face regulatory action: Polymarket paid a $1.4 million settlement to the CFTC in 2022 in part for serving US users without authorization, which drove its later investment in robust location controls.
Geofencing Limitations and the VPN Problem
IP-based geofencing is notoriously imperfect. Virtual Private Network (VPN) services allow users anywhere in the world to route traffic through servers in permitted jurisdictions, making a blocked user appear to be located in an allowed country. As of early 2026, Polymarket responded by blocking known VPN IP ranges and flagging accounts with behavioral signals — such as simultaneous logins from geographically distant IPs — for additional review. However, this escalation is a technological arms race: VPN providers rapidly cycle IP addresses, and determined users continue to find workarounds. For CFTC-Regulated Exchange platforms operating in the US, the legal concern is less about international VPN users and more about US state-level restrictions. Kalshi asserts federal preemption under CFTC authority to override state gambling laws, but some states contest this, creating a patchwork of legal uncertainty where geofencing decisions carry real legal stakes. The interaction between geofencing, Self-Exclusion registries, and Anti-Money Laundering programs will define compliance architecture for the sector through 2027 and beyond.
Sources & References
Last updated: June 24, 2026
Related Terms
More in Regulation & Risk
Find the best odds on every market
Compare live prices across Kalshi, Polymarket, and more — spot arbitrage and trade the sharpest line on any event.
Compare Markets